Smooth HTTP Caching With Rack::Cache

| by Sebastien Auvray Follow 0 Followers on Nov 16, 2008. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

The ways to cache a web application are numerous and often complex. Basic Rails page caching can become tedious to manage as your application infrastructure grows.
Rails 2.2 introduced conditional GET through the use of http headers: last_modified and etag. Following internet standard caching section of RFC2616, Ryan Tomayko introduced Rack::Cache.

Rack::Cache is a piece of Rack middleware that implements most of RFC 2616's caching features with a basic set of storage options (disk, heap, and memcached) and a configuration system for tweaking cache policy. It should work equally well with any Rack-enabled Ruby web framework and is tested on Ruby 1.8.6 and 1.8.7.

Part of its design was inspired by the Python cache framework Django.

Rack::Cache acts as a gateway proxy (Varnish , Squid) without all the pain to settle it. Rack::Cache supports expiration-based caching, validation model, and Vary header fields.

As Ryan King states, you can migrate smoothly to real gateway proxy if your application really needs it:

Once your application gets larger and more complex, it makes sense to use an http reverse proxy cache like squid or varnish, but transitioning from rails-style page caching to HTTP caching is non-trivial. You have to change your deployment and your application in significant ways. Not fun.

With Rack::Cache you only have to change your deployment. You can even do it incrementally. You could start by using Rack::Cache to cache in the heap, later switch to the filesystem and finally to memcache. When that reaches its scalability limits you can add squid or varnhish in front of your application, then remove Rack::Cache. Deployments that involve only one major change at each step are much easier to get right than trying to make several big changes in a single operation.

It will be interesting to have a look at Ryan's upcoming benchmarks.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread


Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you