BT

Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development

Write for InfoQ

Topics

Choose your language

InfoQ Homepage News Can Product Owner and Scrum Master be Combined?

Can Product Owner and Scrum Master be Combined?

Leia em Português

This item in japanese

Bookmarks

Many short staffed teams or small organizations consider combining the role of Scrum Master (SM) and Product Owner (PO) into one person. Is it advisable? Have other people done it? What are the options?

According to Mike Cohn, author of Agile Estimating and Planning, the Scrum Master is:

...responsible for making sure a Scrum team lives by the values and practices of Scrum. The ScrumMaster protects the team by making sure they do not overcommit themselves to what they can achieve during a sprint. The ScrumMaster facilitates the daily scrum and becomes responsible for removing any obstacles that are brought up by the team during those meetings. The ScrumMaster role is typically filled by a project manager or a technical team leader but can be anyone.

In addition, the Scrum Master owns quality on behalf of the team.

Whereas the Product Owner is:

... (typically someone from a Marketing role or a key user in internal development) prioritizes the Product Backlog. The Scrum Team looks at the prioritized Product Backlog and slices off the top priority items and commits to completing them during a sprint. These items become the Sprint Backlog. In return for their commitment to completing the selected tasks (which, by definition, are the most important to the product owner), the product owner commits that he or she will not throw new requirements at the team during the sprint. Requirements are allowed to change (and change is encouraged) but only outside the sprint. Once the team starts on a sprint it remains maniacally focused on the goal of that sprint.

As Matt Gelbwaks pointed out, the Product owner is responsible for concepts and ideas (i.e. the backlog), while Scrum Master is responsible for execution and quality, so the Product Owner wants more features while Scrum Master is focusing on getting it done. Tomek Wlodarek explains that the different points of view are only half the problem. The other half is the time commitment: "In a corporate environment what I learnt is that a SM is a full time job for a team as big as 5-6 people. ... the PO role for that team turned out to be 60% - 100% job."

Dan Rawsthorne, Coach with Danube Technologies, wrote:

I've done it, back in the day before I knew any better. ... I combined the PO, SM, and Lead Designer roles. In order to keep my team self-organized, I used to have skits in front of them: "on this hand... on the other hand... what should I do?" It worked out, but was very difficult, and I never want to do it again, and I don't want anybody else to try it either.

Tom Mellor has also seen it work once, noting that it took a rather unique individual who is coaching full time now.

Steve Eichert, had the most optimistic answer saying "Assuming a single person is able to fill both of these roles by not mixing and matching it seems feasible that they could be done by a single person if absolutely required.". However, even he recommends keeping them separate.

Finally Ken Schwaber noted (in a CSM class) that experienced Scrum Master could pinch hit for the Product Owner until a proper one has been identified and trained.

Rate this Article

Adoption
Style

BT