BT

InfoQ Homepage News Interview: Guy Steele Interviews John McCarthy, Father of Lisp

QCon.ai - Applied AI for Developers Apr 15 - 17, 2019, San Francisco. Save an extra $80 with INFOQAI19!

Interview: Guy Steele Interviews John McCarthy, Father of Lisp

Bookmarks

In this phone interview that took place in front of an audience at OOPSLA 2008, Guy Steele spins a yarn with John McCarthy, the father of Lisp, attempting to find  out some details surrounding the language inception in the 50’ and its later evolution.

Watch: Guy Steele Interviews John McCarthy, Father of Lisp (56 min.)

Steele tries to bring back McCarthy’s memories from 1956-1958 when he started thinking about “an algebraic list processing language for artificial intelligence work on the IBM 704 computer”. McCarthy does not forget to mention those who were involved in those early days, either by providing good ideas to him or by working on the Lisp project itself: John Backus, Herbert Gelernter, Carl Gerberich, Steve Russell, Mike Levin and others.

This interview is interesting because it shows some of the Lisp creator’s feelings about the language conception and evolution. For example, McCarthy does not like some “Englishy” syntax that was added later like “loop”.

McCarthy still wishes he succeeded with expressing common sense with mathematical expressions. That’s what he wanted to do back then, and that’s what he challenges today’s students with.

The interview is full of impressions and names from a thrilling age of programming, when many believed Artificial Intelligence was easy, and presents some of the influences languages like FORTRAN, ALGOL, IPL, PL 1 had on Lisp.

Rate this Article

Adoption
Style

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Community comments

  • Typos in the transcript

    by Paul McJones /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Noland Simon => Newell & Simon

    girdle numbers => Gödel numbers

    sum ends => summands

    Herbert Stan => Herbert Stoyan

    Kozak => [Alan] Kotok

    "Amin!" => "Amen!"

    Lennart => Lenat

    Ken Pitman => Kent Pitman

    John Al => JonL [John Lyle]

  • Thanks for posting the interview

    by peter lin /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    that was a fun interview. thanks!

  • Re: Typos in the transcript

    by Mark Wutka /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Very enjoyable interview!

    These are the typos that I thought either skipped information or misconveyed it:

    variable lockup => variable lookup

    Kotok and ... => Kotok and [Elwyn] Berlekamp

    logical connectiveness => logical connectives

    the idea had, in my opinion => But IPL had, in my opinion

    you are currently convinced that while => you [were?] currently convinced for a while that

    IPL had a boss => APL had a boss (If we take Fortran or IPL, each of them had a boss - APL had a boss)

    trying to disclaim that boss => trying to disclaim that bossness

    garbage collection was needed anyway => garbage collection was neater anyway

    and a collected group => an eclectic group

    "did he get into Lisp" => "did it get into Lisp"

    that I did understand all of until => that I didn't understand at all until

    differentiating in the formula and so forth => ... a formula and so forth. So I thought they were gonna hit a wall.

  • Re: Typos in the transcript

    by Mark Wutka /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Just noticed one other..
    Lisp and Prologue => Lisp and Prolog

  • Re: Typos in the transcript

    by Luciano Ramalho /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Touring complete => Turing complete

  • Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Allen Kane -> Alan Kay (he was supposed to do the interview).

  • Typos fixed

    by Abel Avram /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Thanks for noticing the typos. I believe they all have been fixed.

  • Re: Typos fixed

    by Thierry Pirot /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    Lisp structure -> list structure
    (in every place where this occurs)

    Fortran-Lisp -> Fortran list

    The idea of ... as a function -> the idea of cons as a function

    consoles -> cons cells

    Heilsberg -> Hejlsberg

    Lisp programs or Lisp data -> the fact that Lisp programs are Lisp data, I think

    Close related to the idea of a Lisp program and Lisp data is that it enables you to encode, apply and eval
    -> Closely related to the idea that a Lisp program be Lisp data is that it enables you to encode APPLY and EVAL

    The idea of eval is -> The idea of EVAL as

    High order -> Higher order

  • Re: Typos fixed

    by Erik Rantapaa /

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    another one:

    "the math labs, the maximums" -> "the MATHLABs, the Macsymas"

    c.f. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MATHLAB and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macsyma

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

BT

Is your profile up-to-date? Please take a moment to review and update.

Note: If updating/changing your email, a validation request will be sent

Company name:
Company role:
Company size:
Country/Zone:
State/Province/Region:
You will be sent an email to validate the new email address. This pop-up will close itself in a few moments.