Java 8 Update 11 Broke Third Party Tools

| by Ben Evans Follow 17 Followers on Aug 01, 2014. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

Oracle's latest release of Java, 8 update 11 (and 7 update 65), has caused problems for some third-party tools. One of the affected tools is ZeroTurnaround's JRebel, with the Groovy programming language also reporting incompatibilities. Other affected tools include Javassist, a Java bytecode manipulation library, with some users also reporting problems with tools such as Google's Guice (in some circumstances - notably those using AOP) and the Jacoco code coverage tool. Oracle confirmed the bug via a test case from Jochen Theodorou, from the Groovy project team.

The problems seem to stem from a change in the JVM's bytecode verification subsystem in 8u11. The Java language requires any call to a superclass constructor to be the first action undertaken by a constructor, but it seems that this was not enforced by the bytecode verifier in earlier versions of the platform. Oracle's decision to begin firmer enforcement of this language feature may be closing a language specification bug, but it seems to have impacted a number of tools within the ecosystem.

So far there is no indication that any Java code that doesn't use bytecode reweaving or AOP techniques is affected by this bug. Release 8u11 is understood to be fully compatible with all bytecode created directly by javac that is not subject to reweaving techniques, although the widespread nature of these techniques in modern frameworks may make this of limited comfort to developers.

Oracle have yet to announce a release date for a fix and so far the only comprehensive workarounds are to use the -noverify switch or to refrain from upgrading until a fix can be released. However, individual tools are coming up with workarounds on their own, for example Anton Arhipov (Zero Turnaround) confirms that the latest release of JRebel (5.6.1) includes a workaround for this issue.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread


Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you