HP/Mercury Acquisition: Commentary
The acquisition of Mercury by HP, in turn, is much larger — a $4.5 billion deal, with a nice 33 percent premium for Mercury shareholders. Obviously, HP is interested not only in Systinet's products, but in the BTO and testing tools as well. Anne Thomas Manes, Research Director with Burton Group, told InfoQ she believes the Mercury product set fills a pretty big gap in the HP product portfolio, and there's not too much overlap. But she also had some concerns: "HP is not known for incorporating software acquisitions especially well. HP has hundreds of overlapping products that don't work together very well. Mercury has the same problem," she said. In her opinion, the Systinet division's platform is still the best SOA governance solution available.
Among those who will probably not agree with this statement are two of Systinet's competitors: Infravio and Software AG. "HP, Mercury and Systinet provide a strong solution for governance, but is weighted heavily towards centralized IT and control of IT systems," said InfoQ SOA editor Miko Matsumura, who also happens to be VP of Technology Standards at Infravio. "As an independent vendor of SOA Governance Registry Repository, Infravio's solution becomes even more important for enabling federated organizations to achieve business agility."
Software AG's Ivo Totev, Vice President, Product Marketing crossvision believes there are only two globally available SOA management and governance solutions: Systinet and CentraSite from Software AG and Fujitsu. "Our customers want choice — that's why we sincerely hope the repeated acquisitions of Systinet will not have negative impact," Totev said.
Systinet not only provides a registry/repository solution, but also a very advanced Web services stack for both Java and C++. It will also be interesting what will become of these under the new stewardship.
Phil Windley's point of view
In her (Anne Thomas Manes)opinion, the Systinet division's platform is still the best SOA governance solution available.
Then again, according to InfoWorld Labs, Infravio's product scores more highly than Systinet. Links to both reviews by Phil Windley, the Infoworlds Labs reviewer are available in this commentary about the HP/Mercury acquisition:
Full disclosure, I'm an employee of Infravio.
Will this assist them in the quest to deliver value?
Mercury invited me in to learn about what I had in mind in the test automation tools space. I have experience with Microsoft and was weary that the invitation would be a chance for Mercury to duplicate my ideas in their products.
What I found at Mercury - and confirmed in subsequent meetings and one consulting engagement - was a group of hard-core technologists looking for ways they could move up the value chain for their enterprise customers. For example, I found through my PushToTest experience that providing test tools for developers and QA technicians is important because they are the key recommenders within an enterprise. But they also lack budget-spending authority.
The real money is with the CIO's operating information systems and VP Engineering for quality testing. The CIOs are driven by a need for governance - a code word for control. They are fear-driven to need control over all the application development, XML, and database work going on in their datacenters. Delivering governance is key to tapping into enterprise IT budgets.
I know very little about HP's governance offerings. Yet, I do know that HP more or less invented Web Services and then gave up on it. It seems to me that Mercury's investments to know SOA, Web Services, and to deliver solutions for CIOs and VP Engineering users is a big "plus" for HP's governance offerings.
Re: Will this assist them in the quest to deliver value?