Throwing the Keyboard is Not the Answer

| by Deborah Hartmann Preuss Follow 0 Followers on Aug 08, 2006. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

It happens on every project, at some point or another, even on collaborative teams: there is stress and someone behaves badly - perhaps retreating to "command-and-control" mode rather than seeking team-member input.  There is anger or hurt feelings, or both, and teamwork is impacted. 

Esther Derby, a well known facilitator in the software domain, reminds us that we have choices when dealing with conflict, that we can take responsible actions that are more constructive all around.  She says that approaches to conflict tend to fall into five common behavioural patterns:
  • Collaborative Problem Solving -- trying to find options that will work for both.  
  • Competition -- one aim in mind: being right, not willing to explore other options.
  • Yielding -- accommodating the other person’s wishes without addressing one's own concerns.  
  • Avoidance -- pretend the difference doesn't exist.
  • Compromise -- trying to meet halfway.
Derby says that most of us tend toward a preferred style for approaching conflict.  Sometimes it works for us—and sometimes it doesn't. 

When we approach every conflict with the same style, regardless of what's at stake and without consideration for maintaining important relationships, we may win in the short term but lose in the long term.  Or we may avoid a difficult conversation but build up resentment. We're all more effective when we develop our ability to approach conflict with the style that suits the situation.  Consciously choosing which approach fits best, given the stakes and the relationships, is a winning strategy every time.

In the StickyMinds article Approaching Conflict in Style, Derby examines when each of these responses to conflict is helpful, and when they are problematic.  Throwing the keyboard isn't mentioned: perhaps one should consider these other strategies first.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread


Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you