Microsoft has always put the needs of business customers and home users first. There is another sector that relies on computers, one that has been neglected for decades: the scientific community.
Between now and 2020 Microsoft is planning to ramp up its support for the scientific community. Some of the key milestones from their roadmap include…
- Expanding use of COTS (customised off the shelf) software / technology: moving away from ‘build your own’ in science
- Move towards program execution for scientific applications hosted in database (taking the application to the data, rather than the data to the application)
- Data ‘behind’ scientific papers available in machine readable formats
- Symbolic computation integrated into scientific databases and programming languages.
- Development of equivalent of ‘Office’ for Scientists – Integrated suite of easy to use, standardised, well maintained applications spanning mathematical libraries, algorithms, data management, scientific paper writing, visualisation and theoretical tools (e.g. symbolic maths) that work together well.
- Broadly available domain-specific computational frameworks, components, reference architectures
Community comments
Use our software
by Michael Neale,
myopic
by Cameron Purdy,
Fortress
by Geoffrey Wiseman,
Use our software
by Michael Neale,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
And no one gets hurt (with patent threats).
myopic
by Cameron Purdy,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
The scientific community has hardly been neglected. Maybe Microsoft neglected the scientific community, but I doubt that anyone noticed .. unless they tried to use Excel to do their calculations ..
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol Coherence: Data Grid for Java and .NET
Fortress
by Geoffrey Wiseman,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
I've been interested to see a little bit of the information about Fortress as a language for science; but I've done so little work in the "scientific" domain (as I'd define it, anyway), I don't know if that's just hype.