Release It!: Design and Deploy Production-Ready Software by Michael Nygard discusses what it takes to make production-ready software, and explains how this differs from feature-complete software. On his website, Nygard described the motivation behind writing this book:
This book comes from my extensive experience living with systems in production. I've often been the one to get woken up at three in the morning when some supposedly 24x7 system goes down.
Other books on design and architecture only tell you how to meet functional requirements. They help your software pass QA. In "Release It!", I'll show you how to make your software production ready. If you don't want to wear an electronic leash, you need this book.
Read Book Excerpt and Review: Release It!
From the article:
InfoQ: There seems to be a tension between the up-front work involved in creating production-ready software and the Agile idea that you do something only when you need to, and refactor as necessary - what are your thoughts on this?
Michael Nygard: As an agile developer, I struggle with this tension myself. I don't have a perfect answer for resolving it, but I think there's a parallel here to good object-oriented design.
Once you've written some code and some unit tests that pass---regardless of which came first---you refactor the code to improve the design. "Improve". Well, what does it mean to improve the design? Doesn't that mean you have to have some notion of "better" and "worse" as it applies to OO design? It does, and that's where Martin Fowler's "code smells" from Refactoring come in. "Code smells" are a qualitative way to talk about better and worse design without getting all hung up on metrics.
I think there's something similar for the architecture. For me, a remote call without a timeout is an "architecture smell". So is a SOAP call or a REST GET that tries to fetch all orders for a customer, without applying a limit.
So, while I do not subscribe to big design up front, or "big architecture up front", I do believe in defining the boundaries within the system, designing failure modes into it, and eliminating "architecture smells" as we encounter them.
/filters:no_upscale()/sponsorship/topic/25afca57-6bcb-4c42-9a70-fbea10ce4fc7/MicrosoftLogoRSB-1678874949003.png)
/articles/dotnet-spa-templates-proxy/en/smallimage/ASP-NET-SPA-templates-proxy-changes-small-1683016303172.jpg)
/presentations/net-apps-cloud/en/smallimage/infoq-live-logo-small-1683100880551.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/asp-dotnet-minimal-apis/en/smallimage/logo-1678972581766.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/functional-dotnet-development/en/smallimage/Fsharp-vs-Csharp-is-one-more-functional-than-the-other-small-1676023056578.jpg)
/articles/twitter-staging-environment/en/smallimage/logo-1675028662311.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/dotnet-grpc-json-transcoding/en/smallimage/logo-1674822319367.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/metrics-quality-software/en/smallimage/finding-adequate-metrics-for-process-quality-in-software-development-small-1673953064694.jpg)
/articles/Dotnet-Seven-MSMQ-Alternatives/en/smallimage/logo-1670585778128.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/gdpr-with-spring-and-aop/en/smallimage/easy-implementation-of-GDPR-with-aspect-oriented-programming-small-1684505109873.jpg)
/articles/open-source-java-profilers/en/smallimage/unleash-power-of-open-source-java-profilers-small-1681206807197.jpg)
/articles/rmi-to-websocket/en/smallimage/migrate-a-RMI-based-legacy-application-to-WebSocket-small-1680106723513.jpg)
/articles/rapid-startup-of-your-cloud-native-java/en/smallimage/logo-1680293937095.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/billions-messages-minute/en/smallimage/LOGO-1679471830613.jpg){kind=logo}
/minibooks/jhipster-mini-book-7/en/smallimage/logo-1677849630224.jpg){kind=logo}
/presentations/java-compiler-intermediate-representation/en/smallimage/chris_seaton-s-1679038354209.jpg)
/minibooks/2022-infoq-trends-reports/en/smallimage/LOGO-1672051527011.jpg){kind=logo}
/articles/series-apache-kafka-streams/en/smallimage/apache-kafka-article-series-logo-small-1673455781546.jpg){kind=logo}
/presentations/jfr-observability/en/smallimage/Ben Evans-s-1675024642432.jpg)
/articles/secure-kafka-cluster-strimzi/en/smallimage/securing-a-kafka-cluster-in-kubernetes-using-strimzi-small-1671647644310.jpg)
/articles/graalvm-java-compilers-openjdk/en/smallimage/small-image-jdk-2023-1671096273181.jpg)
/articles/java-jvm-trends-2022/en/smallimage/InfoQ-Trends-Report-small-1670863712433.jpeg)
/articles/architecture-modernization-domain-driven-discovery/en/smallimage/start-your-architecture-modernization-with-domain-driven-discovery-small-1683106490819.jpg)
Community comments
Superb book
by Stefan Tilkov,
Re: Superb book
by Mirko Nasato,
It sounds very interesting
by hernan garcia,
Excellent Article
by Ranjiva Prasad,
Superb book
by Stefan Tilkov,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
Michael's book is among the best IT books I've read in the past five years. Thoroughly recommended!
It sounds very interesting
by hernan garcia,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
As the lead of an agile team that is some time wake up at three in the morning I really feel the urge to read this book, just adding it to my queue.
Excellent Article
by Ranjiva Prasad,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
I will be buying this book as a belated Xmas present for everyone on my team. I have lost count of the number of times that I have been woken up at 3am in the morning, because my developers did not think about how an application they built would behave in a production environment. The extra sleep I will get will far offset the costs of buying 20 copies of this book!
Re: Superb book
by Mirko Nasato,
Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.
+1
An excellent book indeed, and a needed one. I really think "the industry" (i.e. we developers) need to put more focus on how applications behave in production.
Maybe part of the problem is also that many developers will never get awakened at 3am anyway, because operations will be someone else's job, and they don't get a chance to learn much about this very important aspect of software development.
I think it would be interesting to investigate "organisational" patterns as well that can help improve application robustness, in addition to the technical design patterns.