Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development

Write for InfoQ


Choose your language

InfoQ Homepage News Serious Memory Leaks Plague WPF

Serious Memory Leaks Plague WPF

This item in japanese


WPF, also known as Windows Presentation Foundation, represents the future of UI on the Windows platform. And if Microsoft has its way, its younger sibling Silerlight will take over the web and mobile markets. But like any new technology, it has some issues to work through including some rather serious memory leaks.

There are many memory leaks to discuss, so bare with us. The first one has been known for a while, but its cause is non-obvious to most developers, even ones reasonably familiar with WPF. The conditions needed to cause it follow:

  1. A data-binding path refers to property P of object X.
  2. Object X contains a direct reference or an indirect reference to the target of the data-binding operation.
  3. Property P is accessed through a PropertyDescriptor object instead of a DependencyProperty object or a PropertyInfo object.

This issue is described in detail in KB 938416.

Next up is a nasty bug that is triggered when you replace one data-bound collection with another. Ayende Rahien has a block of code that reproduces the issue. For an explanation, we turn to Mike Brown:

Digging in I discovered that the Binding System doesn't deregister the listener for the "Name" property when you notify that Data has changed.

It's definitely a bug and it has to do with the way the binding system looks at the binding in question. When you notify that Data has changed, rather than deregistering the existing bindings further down the tree (in this case the Name binding on your Textblock) and reusing the elements it appears that an entirely new set of elements are created. Unfortunately, the Textblock never gets the opportunity to deregister its binding.

Now if you made Data an observable collection (necessitates making your anonymous type into a full class) and made the collection raise a CollectionChanged event (e.g. Data[0]=Data[0]), everything works just fine.

This next group of memory leaks come to us from a Microsoft blogger going by the handle jgoldb.

  • CMilChannel leaks if initial HWND is destroyed on XP.
  • ShutdownListener leaked for each thread using Binding
  • Create and Destroy WriteableBitmap on XP in HW
  • SW Viewport 3D w/ VisualBrush, WB, etc. leaks on XP

In addition to these leaks, he lists some other common developer mistakes that lead to memory leaks as well as some past WPF issues that have been since corrected.

Rate this Article


Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Community comments

  • Memory leak or memory leak?

    by Jim Leonardo,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    I was conducting an interview for a developer position along with one of the other team leads and was reminded of how different developers mean different things by "memory leak".
    To an 'old school' dev, a memory leak usually means memory that's still allocated after program execution completes and not released back to the OS.
    To a Java/.Net developer, we usually mean something that is 'mysteriously' not being garbage collected.
    Usually, in a GC'ed language, failure to collect is traceable to the developer in the long run. However, it requires the dev understanding nuances to anticipate the problem. Examples include events and handles to unmanaged resources in the .net world. At any rate, this kind of leak usually goes away with application shut down. Quite unlike an old school lead, that is.

  • Re: Memory leak or memory leak?

    by Werner Schuster,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    I'm not sure about your old school dev memory leak - all memory in an address space is returned to the OS after a program is terminated, so there's not much chance for a leak there - at least in modern OSes released in the past decade [At this someone'll point out a reference to an arcane bug or behavior in some OS that _does_ allow that].

    I guess there might be some chance for a resource leak, where in some funky situation a program acquires a resource, then dies but doesn't manage to return it (and the resource is not one that automatically gets released after the demise of the process). But I wouldn't quite call these memory leaks.

    If there's a memory leak in a non-GC environment, it's simply a case of a malloc (or one of its pals) that's not matched by a free.

    In GC environments I find memory leaks are usually not caused by bad book keeping of memory blocks but by conceptual errors at a higher level; eg. adding listeners to models or GUI elements but not removing them, which is bad if the model or GUI lives longer than the developer expected.

  • so true

    by chris donnan,

    Your message is awaiting moderation. Thank you for participating in the discussion.

    The guy who sits next to me said "hey Chris - it seems like you just posted this on Infoq!". I have been working on a WPF UI for some months now and continue to find WPF leaks galore. The bottom line is that it does not do what you expect - you must know when things are not taken care of by WPF. The APIs are therefore 'leaky' as well.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p