Your opinion matters! Please fill in the InfoQ Survey!

Visual Studio Dropping Support for Itanium

| by Jonathan Allen Follow 247 Followers on Apr 08, 2010. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

A note to our readers: As per your request we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise, while not losing sight of anything that is important. Get email and web notifications by choosing the topics you are interested in.

According to Dan Reger, Senior Technical Product Manager for Windows Server, there will be no new versions of Windows Server, SQL Server, or Visual Studio with Itanium support after this year. With advances in the x64 architecture taking the spot light, there seems to be little need to also support the Itanium platform. Dan writes,

Why the change? The natural evolution of the x86 64-bit (“x64”) architecture has led to the creation of processors and servers which deliver the scalability and reliability needed for today’s “mission-critical” workloads. Just this week, both Intel and AMD have released new high core-count processors, and servers with 8 or more x64 processors have now been announced by a full dozen server manufacturers. Such servers contain 64 to 96 processor cores, with more on the horizon.

Microsoft isn’t the only vendor to abandon the Itanium processor. Last December it was reported in Network Word that Red Hat would not be supporting it in Enterprise Linux 6. The previous version, Enterprise Linux 5, will continue to be supported until 2017. As Windows Server 2008 is slightly younger, Microsoft users will have support until 2018.

In addition to the loss of some significant OS vendors, the processor itself is facing stiff competition from AMD’s x64 architecture. The current version, the Tukwila, tops out at 4 cores and 1.73 GHz while AMD’s Opteron has up to 12 cores and 2.3GHz. While clock speeds cannot be directly compared between different processor architectures, it does make the Itanium look bad. Even worse is the next processor, the Poulson, will only have 8 cores and is still two years away while next year’s offering from AMD is expected to have 16 cores. As for benchmarks, the TPC-E record is now held by NEC using 8 Intel Xeon processors.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread
Community comments

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread


Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you