Top Quality Standards for Architecture Reviews
InfoQ's research widget has been deprecated. It should continue to work however, and we hope to relaunch it at some point in the future.
Architecture is one of the most important elements in software development. Many organizations do architecture reviews due to its critical role. But different organizations in different industries and contexts have their own different standards of qualities. Finding out the most common ones might lead to better ways to develop and improve the standards for these organisations, and it's also give the community a common base to start discussion.
1. Functional: Even if I am signed in, after I submitted vote, it asks me for my 3rd party ID. This smells to me as marketing trick to get some leads?
2. Contextual: This survey lacks context. In order to answers have any real value there has to be some context inside which we are considering proposed qualities.
Functionality not that important?
Re: Functionality not that important?
Inversely, given that any review has finite resources, the focus of architectural reviews are the concerns (Changeability, Buildability, etc.) which cannot be assessed by tools idea for addressing functionality and correctness.
Re: Needs context