Article: Distributed JBI

| by Stefan Tilkov Follow 2 Followers on Feb 10, 2009. Estimated reading time: less than one minute |

A note to our readers: You asked so we have developed a set of features that allow you to reduce the noise: you can get email and web notifications for topics you are interested in. Learn more about our new features.

Officially, the JBI (Java Business Integration) standard is limited to a single Java Virtual Machine (JVM) instance. In a new article, Sun’s Derek Frankforth describes and contrasts the strengths and weaknesses two different styles of setting up a distributed JBI topology using OpenESB, and shows how they complement each other in the end.

Derek points out that while the specification doesn’t explicitly state how a distributed version would function, two different ways of setting up a distributed JBI-based ESB setup have emerged. These topologies differ in the way they set up the individual ESB instances: In a homogeneous topology, each bus instance is configured with the same components; in a heterogeneous setup, the set of components is different. Finally, a combined topology aims to blend the advantages of both into a solution that should satisfy most needs.

In his discussion about the different strategies, Derek takes into account factors such as scalability, management, awareness and transport diversities. While he uses the open source OpenESB as his reference, many of the architectural implications can be transferred to other ESBs, whether JBI-based or not.

Read the full article for details.

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

JBI is a good starting model. by Ernest Rider

I agree JBI is a good starting point for a distributed S.E.D.A Controller. The standard is very good at modularizing basic concepts where other standards are very unclear. The JBI, SCA, and Mule component swiss army knife will succeed under the open source model but I am not sure SCA will be the root Strategy Pattern for doing it.

However I think the more general purpose direction might be to standardize on a distributed S.E.D.A Controller interface so that other technologies with WSDL bindings (not necessarilly heavyweight XML bindings either) can participate as a distributed multi hop load balancing and optimization regime. The benefits would be great, especially in utility computing, and predictive load alerting.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

1 Discuss

Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.

Recover your password...


Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.


More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.


Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you