BT

New Early adopter or innovator? InfoQ has been working on some new features for you. Learn more

MySQL Changes: More Expensive and No InnoDB for the Classic Edition

| by Abel Avram on Nov 04, 2010. Estimated reading time: 1 minute |

Oracle has published a new comparison table for the MySQL Editions offered with support. Major changes include a rise of the price and InnoDB is removed from the Classic Edition.

Previous prices for the Enterprise edition of MySQL as offered by Sun a year ago ranged from $599* to $4,999* per server per year. Oracle is currently offering four editions: Classic, Standard, Enterprise, and Cluster Carrier Grade. Standard, Enterprise and Cluster come with support at prices starting at $2,000 for a server with 1-4 sockets/year, and going up to $5,000 and $10,000. A socket is basically a processor that can have multiple cores. Prices for servers with more than 5 sockets  are not disclosed.

The price for Classic is also not disclosed, those interested being directed to contact the MySQL Embedded Sales Team. Classic is available only for “ISVs, OEMs and VARs to license as an embedded database”, and it no longer contains the InnoDB transactional storage engine. InnoDB was created and it is developed by Innobase Oy, a company acquired by Oracle back in 2005, so practically it belongs to Oracle.

According to a tweet posted by MySQL, the free MySQL Community Edition is still available with InnoDB:

MySQL/InnoDB still available for download under the GPL from http://mysql.com/download/ and http://dev.mysql.com/ - no change here.

While the Community Edition is untouched by the latest price changes, a question can be asked: “Is Oracle going to continue to invest in the GPL version of MySQL, keeping it a viable option, or will everybody have to choose a paid edition or move to another database?” 

Rate this Article

Adoption Stage
Style

Hello stranger!

You need to Register an InfoQ account or or login to post comments. But there's so much more behind being registered.

Get the most out of the InfoQ experience.

Tell us what you think

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

I moved to PostgreSQL by Davi Tavares

I've decided to move to PGSQL, two years ago....

Move away by Oyku Gencay

No matter how much you love MySQL, it is time to move away...

Re: Move away by Vladimir Vlach

I agree. We are slowly moving to something else. Perhaps NoSQL where possible. Can't predict future and things are not looking good.

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

Allowed html: a,b,br,blockquote,i,li,pre,u,ul,p

Email me replies to any of my messages in this thread

3 Discuss

Login to InfoQ to interact with what matters most to you.


Recover your password...

Follow

Follow your favorite topics and editors

Quick overview of most important highlights in the industry and on the site.

Like

More signal, less noise

Build your own feed by choosing topics you want to read about and editors you want to hear from.

Notifications

Stay up-to-date

Set up your notifications and don't miss out on content that matters to you

BT